The need for an easy video editing software solution has become steadily more relevant in recent years as the major video editing software companies have battled each other in a game of one-upmanship.
The end result has been that the average consumer level video editing software has become incredibly feature rich but in the process, has become quite complicated as well.
You can’t keep adding features without having to add access to those features through the user interface and this inevitably results in complexity.
They all carry the claim of being “easy video editing software” or “simple video editors” when being described by their respective marketing departments but the truth is, they have become progressively more difficult to use.
I have been asked on a number of forums and through this site to recommend some truly simple video editing programs or an easy video editor that anyone can use.
Something that has all the basic features that a user would need without the shiny “bells and whistles” and complicated interface that comes with it.
I have listed what I think to be the best of this class below but keep in mind that just because they are classified as simple video editing software programs they are not crippled in any way.
They offer all of the basic features you will need to create your own videos with ease.
If you are just a beginner or really don’t see yourself spending hours alone in a darkened room editing your footage, or you just want to get your video masterpieces out as soon as possible with a minimum of fuss then you would be well served by the ones listed below.
They all cover the basic actions of cutting, slicing and dicing with transitions, audio control and a wide range of output formats.
*My standard disclaimer applies: Please, use the trials first to see how you like it and how it likes you and your computer setup before committing to a long term relationship!
Wondershare Filmora 14
Wondershare Filmora is a re-branding of the company’s original simple video editing software which comes in versions for both PC and Mac.
Previously it was just called Wondershare Video Editor then Filmora and now Filmora 14 and although not really an inspired naming originally, you have to admire the efficiency of it!
In terms of ease of use and simplicity without sacrificing functionality I think you would be hard pressed to go past this one.
It downloads and installs very quickly and you will be up and running within minutes.
The interface is a “non-techie” dream come true with no hidden menus or menu items that you have to know in order to access them, it literally is “what you see is what you get.”
Everything is available through an icon that sits in the little menu bar smack dab in the middle of your screen.
Take a look at this intro video they created using the software itself covering the latest additions and to get an idea of what you can do with it and how easy it is.
You can read my complete Wondershare Filmora review here or click the link below to check it out on their site.
Movavi Video Editor
The Movavi Video Editor has been around for quite some time now but it has only been in the past three or so years that it has really come into its own
This is definitely a strong competitor to the abovementioned Filmora matching it feature for feature in most cases.
If I were to try to find a differenece or preference between the two then it would have to be with the interface.
The Movavi interface is a little cleaner and simpler than Filmora making it well worth taking a look at either in the video below, my Movavi Video Editor Review Here or at the Movavi site at the link below
Some Other Good Alternatives…
Roxio Creator, Nero Multimedia Suite, and Cyberlink Media Suite.
All of these are multimedia packages rather than just easy to use video editing software.
They are all good products and if you have a use for ALL the features offered by these full program suites then yes, they are great and have good, easy to use video editing capabilities.
They all offer an image organization feature plus reasonably good image manipulation capabilities, audio editing, video editing and disc creation along with some kind of file distribution feature such as uploading to YouTube etc.
My only reservation with all of them is that most likely a dedicated video editor will have these features anyway while offering the full editing experience.
My pick of the bunch would be the Cyberlink offering because of a superior editing feature set, image manipulation and audio control.
You can take a look at the full features by clicking this link
Anything Else?
There are literally hundreds of video editing software programs out there and many that claim ease of use as their selling point.
You can spend the next year checking them out and still be no closer to a decision.
What I do know is that the software on this page is reliable, fits the criteria of easy or simple and will work very well for the majority of people.
Some Final Thoughts
What do most YouTubers Use to Edit their Videos?
A number of people have been asking me this question for a while now so I thought I would add it as a footnote to this page.
If you try to search online or especially on YouTube the most common answers to this question all refer to the absolute high end, professional video editing programs.
So, first of all let me be clear here, that concept is absolute rubbish!
Answers like that are either ego driven nonsense or an effort to get you to spend way more money than you actually need to.
Look at it this way.
All videos on YouTube roughly break down into about 7 different types.
They are:
- Informational or educational videos including “How to’s,” demonstrations, explainer videos, tutorials and Q&A sessions on various subjects.
- Vlogging which covers unboxing videos (sometimes overlapping into reviews) as well as lifestyle and opinion based video.
- Musical performance videos of both established artists, new artists and newbies doing their own thing.
- Original Content covering memes, comedy and skit videos as well as the occasional serious subject such as opinion pieces and amateur “news” type videos.
- Product or service reviews.
- Gaming.
I think that just about covers it and if you can think of anything else you will probably find it can fit into one of those categories.
The ONLY type of video listed above that would require any sort of advanced video editing software would be professional music videos.
The reason for that is that those videos are most likely shot in a broadcast quality format and were not specifically created for YouTube.
Every other type of video above can be created perfectly well in an entry level video editor like Filmora as listed at the top of this page.
Discover more from The DIY Video Editor
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I have been using Filmora for the last 10 years. I have been mostly happy with it, but am finding the some of my uploaded photos, all taken on various iPhones , will not upload, citing incompatible files. It is more than frustrating! is there a program, similar to filmora that has a better upload ing platform? I often finish the video, usually about 30 min long, have saved it and then get the message that 70 percent of the medial is incompatible . .All files are either img, jpeg, heic or ,mov. files. Id Lile to upload, but not spend at an excessive cost. There is a Black Friday special on Movie this weekend. Is that a good alternative?
I’d be MOST appreciative!
Hi there!
Filmora can handle most files quite well so the problems you are running into may be as a result of either your operating system (Windows? Mac?) or the source of the files you are using.
For example you mention using .heic files.
This is a very Mac oriented file format designed almost exclusively for online viewing, not for editing purposes. The only program I could find that can handle them is CyberLink PowerDirector.
Also you mention .mov file. Generally these are OK but if they came from something like a DJI drone or similar then they may have to be processed into a more standard format before use.
I have no idea about the program you refer to as “Movie.”
If you can give me more data I would be happy to help.
Have you ever reviewed Adobe Premiere Elements? We had the 2018 version, but it drove my husband and I crazy, so eventually he bought Final Cut Pro. I now have to make all my videos myself, but as I am just a beginner Final Cut Pro wouldn’t be a good option and I am not crazy about the video effects they offer, so I asked for a trial version of the Premiere Elements 2022, as we could install that one in our Mac computer, but it is not very different from the 2018, just renders more quickly, something the 2018 is rubbish at and makes one waste a lot of time. Then tried the 2023, but that wouldn’t install in our Mac Catalina and on Windows 10 is awfully slow, to the point that it is unusable, even though we have a potent machine. Their customer service is awful and no technical service to speak of. It would be very good for me to stick with them, as I already knew the 2018, but it all didn’t work out. So now I started to learn how to work with the Final Cut Pro, but the problem was the magnetic timeline. I make music videos and it all got to be a complete mess, with bits of footage falling all over the place. It all sounds rather crazy…… How to professionals who make films much longer than my 3 or 4 minute clips cope with it????
Hi Francisca’
Well the answer to your question is yes! I have reviewed Premiere Elements in the past but I haven’t really looked at it for years now.
First up let me be clear here.
My experience with Adobe and their products has never been a good one.
They have a long history of forcing their users into their own little Adobe universe and Premiere Elements has always ben a sort of “after thought” to them.
They have often let the software just kind of die off then suddenly jump into action and try to get it updated again only to let it continue to die.
If I were you I would just drop it altogether.
I have taken a look at the videos you have on your YouTube Channel and the reality is that you DO NOT need any kind of advanced video editing software.
These days even the most basic programs like Movavi and Filmora are more than enough to meet your needs.
They are both simple to learn and use, will run well on computers that are a little underpowered and come in versions for Mac and Windows.
Movavi Review Here
Filmora Review Here
Hope that helps get back to me if you have other questions I am always happy to help.
Lance
Just wanted to thank you for the Filmora suggestion. For any MovieMaker users out there (looks like a bunch from the other questions), I have found the interface very similar and easy to use. My first time using it, I ripped sections out of 4 different media files, lightly edited, and had a useable video in less than 30 minutes.
I had tried many other options, and all of them had been a struggle to use. Davinchi was the best of those. I did not try any of your other suggestions as Filmora did exactly what I needed.
Glad to hear you liked it and thanks for letting me know!
My biggest problem with Filmora is the very small audio wave form on the timeline. If you’re trying to edit tightly to the audio, it’s challenging to the point of unbelievably frustrating. I’ve suggested they improve that, but apparently it’s not a big concern to many people other than me. 🙂
Also just downloaded Pinnacle and Corel Video Studio to try – wow, whopping file sizes, both of those are over 1GB.
I think I’ve used all of these over the years, never terribly satisfied with any of them. Guess I will upgrade CyberLink Power Director. It’s the closest to the way I like to work.
Hi Vicki,
Yes you are absolutely right!
Unfortunately most of the current consumer level video editing packages are rather weak as far as audio goes.
This applies to both the features and control on offer as well as just the simple convenience of being able to SEE IT!
For most people what they provide seems to be enough although as you have probably seen by your testing Pinnacle and VideoStudio are slightly better.
This year CyberLink released PowerDirector 17 and with the new audio module built-in, they have completely leapt to the front of the pack.